Several months ago, Brandon Stracener wrote a post suggesting that the California Supreme Court (the “Court”) should use summary reversals instead of granting and transferring or depublishing erroneous Court of Appeal decisions. Citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s summary reversal procedure and the Ninth Circuit’s use of memorandum dispositions, Mr. Stracener claims that the use of summary reversals will improve efficiency and eliminate miscarriages of justice. Mr. Stracener’s goal is certainly commendable. Procedures that help the Court manage its workload should always be welcome, and errors, as a general principle, should be corrected whenever possible. But the Court is not the...
Recent Featured Posts
- How the Gann Limit Interacts with Cap-and-Trade
- California Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory First Contract Arbitration For Farmworkers
- Some Thoughts on California’s Fiscal Constitution
- Opinion Analysis: Briggs v. Brown (2017) Part I
- Opinion Analysis: S234148 California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland
Cases & Categories
Sign Up for Email Updates
SCOCAblog is a Berkeley Law & Hastings Law Journal publication focused on substantive coverage of the Supreme Court of California. We provide analysis of doctrinal and procedural issues in cases before the court, and news about developments pertaining to the court itself. Our contributors include former justices of the court, academics and practitioners with subject matter expertise, and advocates experienced in appellate practice before the state high court.
Steven M. Duvernay
David Aram Kaiser
William T. Newman
Shane G. Smith
Brandon V. Stracener